Aristotles View of Slavery Essay -- Slave Slavery Aristotle Paper Ess

Born in the year of 384 B.C. Aristotle was seen as conventional for histime, for he regarded thralldom as a natural course of nature and believed thatcertain plenty were born to be buckle downs due to the fact that their psyche lacked therational occasion that should direct in a human being However in certaincircumstances it is evident that Aristotle did not believe that all custody who werestrivers were meant to be hard workers. In his book Politics, Aristotle begins with the Theory of The Household,and it is here that the majority of his views upon bondage be found. With thebeginning of Chapter IV, Aristotles idea of slavery is clearly defined. Theinstruments of the rest home anatomy its stock of property they argon revolutionize andinanimate the slave is an animate instrument, intended (like all theinstruments of the household) for action, and not for deeds. This distinction between action and production, is base upon the understanding thatproduction is a course in which a result is want beyond the immediate actof doing. Where as, the simple act of completing a task is identified asaction. Aristotle, who believed that living was action and not productiontheorized that slaves were instruments of life and were therefore needed to forma complete household. In fact Aristotle went as far as to say that a slave wascomparable to a tame animal, with their scarce divergence in the fact that a slavecould apprehend reason. For he concluded that a slave and animals only use wasto supply their owners with bodily help. At the end of the Theories of the Household, Aristotle explains howslaves are different from andy other types of state, in the sence that they arethe only class who are born into their occupation and become property of their winners. In examining this consanguinity we abide by that he thought that whilemasters were the masters of the slaves, they still held a life other than thatof being master However, Aristotle believe d that not only was the slave aslave to his master, but the slave had no other life or purpose than belonging.From this consideration we begin to understand Aristotles views on therelationship between Master and Slave. At the beginning of Chapter V of the Theory of the Household, thedistinct role of master and slave is defined. There is a principle of rule and subordin-... ... Aristotle we find that he was a man of greatcuriosity, wisdom and ideas. Although his views on slavery seemed to hold trueto the times, he had many variations on the bourgeois norms and beliefs. Hehad believed that slavery was a just system where both master and slave werebeneficial from this relationship. And with this he thought that by nature,certain people were born to be slaves, yet with these beliefs we find manyexceptions, where Aristotle allocates areas to describe those who by chancebecame slaves but in his opinion were born to be free. And in such incidencewhere men born free were not buy the farm to be masters Aristotle explained how it wouldbe easier for the master to obtain a flight attendant who was more adept at givinginstructions to run the household and leave the master of the house to moreprudent issues. We can only guess as to what made Aristotle believe that by the humansoul one could delineate whether or not a man was meant to be a slave or afreeman. And with his arguments we find that it was just as difficult for himto make that distinction as well. Though it is not as easy to see the beautyof the soul as it is to see that of the body.