Servant Leadership

When we talk virtu on the wholey draws, we refer to hatful who motivate, influence, and build up relationships, based on trust, applaud, and ace. handmaiden examine placeers atomic number 18 people who serve offshoot. So what is handmaid workers? handmaiden drawing card ship is when people lead at a higher level, they make the world a better place, because their goals be focused on the coarseer good (Blanchard, 2010, p. 261). For example, educators be visionaries who help pull ahead goals, school value, and develop potential leading.Educators advocate in streng then(prenominal)ing and developing the mastermind and body, so individuals an apply their talents and become expectant handmaid leaders in the beas of healing, educating, and inspiring. Around devil thousand years ago, rescuer, an educator, exemplified the fully committed and useful consideration leader (Blanchard, 2010, IPPP). prank C. max sound (2007) mentions that Apostle Paul used Jesus as t he ultimate example of retainer leading (p. 1472).The book of Philippians, chapter two verses two through and through eleven (Philippians 22-11, New King mob Version), reas singled how Paul encourages his au tumblence to be humble and give way selflessly he reminds them of how Christ was the ultimate leader who made the ultimate sacrifice (Maxwell, 2007, p. 1473). Maxwell (2007) goes on to say that Jesus stepped through six levels as He moved downward toward us he gave up His divine form, He emptied Himself of every rights, He became a consort, He became a retainer, He was manageable to the point of death, and He died a terrible kind of death (p. 473). Basic aloney, wizard could say that Jesus relinquished the glory that He had due to the break downicular that he was deity and He lacked recognition and glory to/by unbelievers spell He was on earth. He alike took he form of a handmaiden by becoming as a handmaid to man and He appe bed in the form of man so that He co uld die for our sins. Jesus illustrated true humility in action by humbling himself and becoming obedient unto death which resulted in the humility that He displayed in bequeathingly going to the cross to accomplish the will of our Father. According to John C.Maxwell (2007), Jesus displayed humility in coming to earth, emptying Himself and assuming the locating of a man, taking the form of a aban wearment, and by becoming individual and dying (crucifixion) (p. 1470). Apostle Paul lams that all effective leaders essential live such a selfless life and that Jesus is an example of what servant leaders actually is (Maxwell, 2007, p. 1470). In a 1970 essay Robert Greengage states that servant leaders are servants first and leaders later (Degrade, Tillie, & Neal, 2001). passel Blanchard states leading has two parts, vision and carrying out. The visionary role is the leading perspective of servant leading and implementation is the servant aspect of servant leadership (Blanc hard, 2010 p. 262). In the visionary role, leaders must communicate the session discipline and beliefs the organization outdoor stages for and how organisational values encompass the individual value of its members (Blanchard, 2010, p. 262). once people are clear on where they are going, the task of implementation kicks in. It answers the question, How do you make the vision happen (Blanchard, 1991)?The biggest thing leaders make in order to become a servant leader is to withdraw their egos out of the way. leading who are self- overhaul see themselves as the spirit of the feel good about their self and will either wrap up and hope that no sensation nonices them ND/or overcompensate and go out to try to control their surround (Blanchard, 2010, p. 274). On the former(a) hand, servant leaders usually hold in high self-esteem and possess no problem giving credit to others. They want to help their people master their goals through teaching and coaching individuals to do th eir lift out they strike this through developing certain faceistics.The ten major characteristics of servant leadership are compreh abrogateing, empathy, healing relationships, awareness, persuasion, conceptualization, foresight, stewardship, loyalty to human option placement, and commitment to construct connection (Nab, 2011). Without world knowledgeable of your talents, you mold forwardnot move forward without failure. Knowledge is control and great leadership starts with direction. Strengths of consideration leadership The strengths of servant leadership includes self-awareness, morals, concern for others, and h integritystness ( cardinal Needed Strengths, 2011, p. ) all of which has its contributions to organizational using. Self-awareness is vital to servant leadership. Individuals already claim the influence of cultural concepts of leadership resent in their lives so being self-aware of those influences will help the individual to combat them. According to Fou r Needed Strengths (201 1), servant leaders need to wad the meter to listen not only to themselves but to others as well they must take the time to peel the layers back of their character to know who they are and what they stand for (p. 1) which takes me to the next strength, morals.Morals tie heavily with self-awareness and any leader take to view as morals and a strong consciousness of ethics (Four Needed Strengths, 2011, p. 1). The ethics, morals, values, credit world power, and integrity that one possesses should drive their actions and how they lead but without them, great(p) shadows will involve how they lead. The next strength is concern for others. Having concerns for others is about sayting the need of others originally your own call for. servant leadership is about serving others over self-interest so servant leaders are less plausibly to climax pattern self-serving behaviors which are behaviors that hurt others.Four Needed Strengths (2011) noted, If you wan t to take servant leadership seriously you must first have concern for the needs of those that you lead with a servants heart (p. 1). The last strength that Im going to discuss is simplicity. Since the goal of servant leadership is to serve others that should be the main shared out vision for everyone who is doing it. According Four Needed Strengths (201 1), by retentivity it simple you can navigate back to the shared vision goal keeping the aim simple and focused (p. 1).Instead of the traditional leadership dah of prevail subordinates, servant leadership empowers subordinates and inspires them to perform it places great importance on teamwork and building relationships. It as well as contributes to the all-around development of the employees. The servant leader remains patient, is forgiving, and everlastingly estimates for the good in others (Nab, 2011). Again, this contributes to the all-around development of the employees. Weakness of Just as we have strengths in the belie f of servant leadership, there are also weaknesses that we should stay away from.To be a servant leader and have no sense of direction or integrity is settleless and a weakness. Sadly, a servant leader doesnt ever lead by example, and many an(prenominal) people are not influence by their purpose, of being a servant leader, you want understand the direction in which you must go as leader. The decision to act with selfishness, in fear, or without grace is some other weakness. It remains to be seen whether mankind can avoid the negative clashing of rebellious individuals who refuse to be servant people.Some critics would argue that servant leadership has a too loose approach and un meet for a free-enterprise(a) environment. They feel that serving leads to a agency where accountability or accountability gets diluted. Others feel that when the company is faced with issues of downsizing, servant leadership would fall unwavering on its face because servant adhering thrust on hum an resource development. All members whitethorn not be on board with the commitment to building connection among the team members and would prefer individualised lives and work discontinue (Nab, 2011).retainer leadershiphip handmaid leading What is it? The phrase handmaiden leading was coined by Robert K. Greenleaf in The Servant as a Leader, an essay he first print in 1970 (What is servant, ). The servant leader serves first, while aim to lead second. The servant leader serves the people that he or she leads, implying employees are an end in themselves rather than a means to organizational purpose or bottom-line. Servant leadership is meant to replace a command and control, top-down, sit around of focal point. Servant leadership encourages collaboration, trust, foresight, listening, and the ethical use of power and empowerment.A few known examples of servant leaders are George Washington, Gandi and Caesar Chavez. Key Principles In a result released by Nova Southeastern University, 10 principle characteristics were identified of servant leadership ( leadership development -, 2007). 1. Listening Listening skills are vital for all leadership styles. Servant leaders make a deep commitment to intently listen to others. They assay to identify the will of a theme or individual and listen to what is being said. 2. Empathy It is important to understand and have compassion for others. pot need to feel accepted and recognized for their odd qualities. leadership must assume the good intentions and not reject them as people. 3. mend scholarship to heal is a powerful force for transformation and integration. A sterling(prenominal) strength of servant leaders is the potential to heal ones self and others. 4. Awareness General awareness, especially self-awareness, strengthens the servant leaders. 5. thought leadership depone on persuasion rather than positional, classic, decision making. quest to bring over others, rather than coerce, is a goal of the leader. 6. Conceptualize Dreaming great dreams is an ability that must be self-nurtured in a leader. The ability to look at a quandary from a conceptualizing perspective means a leader must think beyond everyday realities. Leaders must hear balance conceptualization and day to day focus. 7. foresightfulness Foresight enables a leader to capitalize on lessons wise(p) from the past, realities of the present and a likely outcome of a decision. 8. Stewardship Greenleafs view of all institutions was one in which CEOs, staff, directors and trustees all play significant roles in retentivity institutions in trust for the greater good of night club. . Commitment to the Growth of People Leaders believe people have an intrinsic value beyond distinct contributions as workers. As a result, genuine interest in the spiritual, captain and soulfulnessal buzz offth of all employees is demonstrated. 10. construction Community Leaders seek to identify a means for building a sense of community among those who work in a given institution. Differences from Other Styles In the approach on general leadership characteristics, the fundamental difference is unquestionable leaderships extend to to be real, whereas servant leaders strive to be right. Servant leadership is a style that lays down a set of characteristics that all leaders are supposed to emulate to attain mastery, and tries to see the character and personality of the leader. On the other hand, trustworthy leaders unravel to rely on their own unique set of experiences and style that has been learned and create throughout their career. The main difference between servant and received styles, when applying into practice, is the serving of others. One of the first-string applications is to give precedency to the interest of others.Servant leaders consummation their duty by fulfilling needs, aspirations and duties of those in their organization. Authentic leaders dont put much emphasis in responding to the nee ds or desires of others. Servant leaders style recommends listening, persuading, and empathy when approaching difficult situations, even in time of crisis. Authentic leaders are proactive and adapt their style to the situation. These leaders can be inspiring in one situation and laborious about people related issues in another (Nayab, 2010). Strengths/Weaknesses (Nayab, 2011) Strengths 1. character to organizational development.Leaders proactively set the way, and will inspire subordinates to perform by empowering them to follow. much(prenominal) enthusiasm leads to collective efforts, creating a synergy. 2. Contribution to the all-around development of the employee. The leader helps employees attain physical and intellectual vitality and receiveness, allowing them to lead balance lives. 3. Servant leaderships value based approach helps organizations in the moving in environment where values, empowerment, and commitment play a big role in success. Weaknesses 1. The soft appro ach does not fit well into a warring environment.Servant leaders may lag behind those other styles better suited for a competitive environment. Accountability and responsibility may get diluted. 2. Does not always work or resolve issues related to employee-organization fit. A primary function of all leaders is to match candidates with organization objectives. Servant leaders put the individuals goals/needs as the primary concern. 3. Building a sense of community among team members may not fit well for all members. Many wish not to share personal lives or aspirations with others at work. Personal ReflectionServant leadership may apply best in certain situations such as politics or affiliation counseling. only in its purest theory, I am not convinced servant leadership is a practical leadership style 100% of the time, for any eccentric person of business. It does have many qualities that I agree with, and practice a large extent of the time. For example, I view everyone I work wi th as a customer. I see it as my responsibility to help them achieve success in their role. It is my duty to provide them with every resource needed in order to succeed, and it is their duty to tell me what they need.Sometimes, that includes a holistic approach, and sometimes it is as simple as acquiring a printer for them. I step lightly when personal life problems present themselves, however. I will assist in providing direction for an employee to get the help they need, such as an EAP program, or a Pastor in our ministry development initiative. On the other hand, it is also my duty to provide corrective action, redirection, or other forms of proceeding feedback when employees chuck from goals, objectives, vision, mission or values. As I mentioned, a part of my management style is to serve the needs of subordinates.I cant retract it isnt entirely for unselfish reasons. I use it as a motivational tactic to achieve positive outcomes. However, I am unreserved in my communicatio ns in order to build trust. Good conductors put the needs of others forrard of their own. However, good managers cannot put subordinate needs ahead of customers, organizational needs or stakeholder needs. Blending all styles of leadership and adapting to unique situations or people will produce positive outcomes in the enormous run. However, it is my whim holding true to only one style of leadership may cause problems for the organization, or an individual manager.References 1. What is servant leadership?. (n. d. ). Retrieved from http//www. greenleaf. org/whatissl/ 2. Leadership development Servant Leadership. (2007, August 1). Retrieved from http//www. nova. edu/studentleadership/development/servant_leadership. html 3. Nayab, N. (2010, June 8). Servant leadership vs. authentic leadership What are the differences?. Retrieved from http//www. brighthub. com/office/home/articles/73574. aspx 4. Nayab, N. (2011, May 25). Servant leadership theory strengths and weaknesses. Retrieved from http//www. brighthub. com/office/home/articles/73511. aspx? cid=parsely_recServant LeadershipServant leadership is both a leadership philosophy and set of leadership practices. Traditional leadership generally involves the accumulation and exercise of power by one at the top of the pyramid. By comparison, the servant-leader shares power, puts the needs of others first and helps people develop and perform as highly as possible. While servant leadership is a timeless concept, the phrase servant leadership was coined by Robert K. Greenleaf in The Servant as Leader, an essay that he first published in 1970.In that essay, Greenleaf said The servant-leader is servant first It begins with the natural feeling that one wants to serve, to serve first. Then conscious choice brings one to aspire to lead. That person is sharply different from one who is leader first, perhaps because of the need to soften an unusual power drive or to acquire material possessionsThe leader-first and the se rvant-first are two extreme types. Between them there are shadings and blends that are part of the infinite variety of human nature. The difference manifests itself in the care taken by the servant-first to make sure that other peoples highest priority needs are being served. The best test, and difficult to administer, is Do those served grow as persons? Do they, while being served, become healthier, wiser, freer, more(prenominal) autonomous, more likely themselves to become servants? And, what is the effect on the least privileged in society? Will they benefit or at least not be further deprived? Advantages This concept is seen as a long-term concept to live and work and therefore has the potential to influence the society in a positive way.The exemplary manipulation of employees leads to an excellent treatment of customers by employees of the company and a high loyalty of the customers. There is a high employee identification with the enterprise. An excellent corporate cultur e is developed. Leaders of a company define themselves by their significance to the people. Servant Leadership can be used as a principle to improve the lead on investment of staff, in all economic sectors. Managers who empower and respect their staff get better performance in return. DisadvantagesServant Leadership is seen as a long-term application and therefore needs time for applying. Lack of authority Servant leadership can actually lead to a minimization of the authority of the subject manager and the overall management function in the business. When employees see their manager catering to their needs in an extreme manner, they are less likely to view him as an authoritative figure. If top management wants front-line mangers to push employees to better performance, it is difficult for the servant manager to step back into this role as a more plethoric figure.Demotivating Servant leadership may lead to demotivation of employees, who then produce few results over time. It is comparable to a parent- youngster relationship in which the parent bails the child out of trouble by constantly stepping into to fix things or to do the work for the child. When employees believe their manager will step in to take care of any needs they have or to resolve issues that arise, they are more tempted to sit back and exert less effort in producing quality and put less thought into resolving issues or conflicts. hold vision Leaders at all levels of a business are distinct from regular employees by their role of developing vision and providing direction. A manager needs to have some level of detachment from his employees so he can explore new opportunities, brainstorm ideas, resolve problems and chew over a picture on where his department, store or business is headed. nevertheless by having this separation from employees can managers focus on vision and then step in to articulate the vision by providing direction to employees.Servant LeadershipServant Leadership What is i t? The phrase Servant Leadership was coined by Robert K. Greenleaf in The Servant as a Leader, an essay he first published in 1970 (What is servant, ). The servant leader serves first, while aspiring to lead second. The servant leader serves the people that he or she leads, implying employees are an end in themselves rather than a means to organizational purpose or bottom-line. Servant leadership is meant to replace a command and control, top-down, model of management. Servant leadership encourages collaboration, trust, foresight, listening, and the ethical use of power and empowerment.A few famous examples of servant leaders are George Washington, Gandi and Caesar Chavez. Key Principles In a publication released by Nova Southeastern University, 10 principle characteristics were identified of servant leadership (Leadership development -, 2007). 1. Listening Listening skills are vital for all leadership styles. Servant leaders make a deep commitment to intently listen to others. They seek to identify the will of a group or individual and listen to what is being said. 2. Empathy It is important to understand and have compassion for others.People need to feel accepted and recognized for their unique qualities. Leaders must assume the good intentions and not reject them as people. 3. Healing Learning to heal is a powerful force for transformation and integration. A greatest strength of servant leaders is the potential to heal ones self and others. 4. Awareness General awareness, especially self-awareness, strengthens the servant leaders. 5. Persuasion Leaders rely on persuasion rather than positional, authoritative, decision making. Seeking to convince others, rather than coerce, is a goal of the leader. 6. Conceptualize Dreaming great dreams is an ability that must be self-nurtured in a leader. The ability to look at a quandary from a conceptualizing perspective means a leader must think beyond everyday realities. Leaders must seek balance conceptualization and d ay to day focus. 7. Foresight Foresight enables a leader to capitalize on lessons learned from the past, realities of the present and a likely outcome of a decision. 8. Stewardship Greenleafs view of all institutions was one in which CEOs, staff, directors and trustees all play significant roles in holding institutions in trust for the greater good of society. . Commitment to the Growth of People Leaders believe people have an intrinsic value beyond tangible contributions as workers. As a result, genuine interest in the spiritual, professional and personal growth of all employees is demonstrated. 10. Building Community Leaders seek to identify a means for building a sense of community among those who work in a given institution. Differences from Other Styles In the approach on general leadership characteristics, the fundamental difference is authentic leaderships strive to be real, whereas servant leaders strive to be right. Servant leadership is a style that lays down a set of char acteristics that all leaders are supposed to emulate to attain success, and tries to shape the character and personality of the leader. On the other hand, authentic leaders tend to rely on their own unique set of experiences and style that has been learned and developed throughout their career. The main difference between servant and authentic styles, when applying into practice, is the serving of others. One of the primary applications is to give priority to the interest of others.Servant leaders exercise their duty by fulfilling needs, aspirations and duties of those in their organization. Authentic leaders dont put much emphasis in responding to the needs or desires of others. Servant leaders style recommends listening, persuading, and empathy when approaching difficult situations, even in times of crisis. Authentic leaders are proactive and adapt their style to the situation. These leaders can be inspiring in one situation and tough about people related issues in another (Nayab, 2010). Strengths/Weaknesses (Nayab, 2011) Strengths 1. Contribution to organizational development.Leaders proactively set the way, and will inspire subordinates to perform by empowering them to follow. Such inspiration leads to collective efforts, creating a synergy. 2. Contribution to the all-around development of the employee. The leader helps employees attain physical and intellectual vitality and fitness, allowing them to lead balance lives. 3. Servant leaderships value based approach helps organizations in the business environment where values, empowerment, and commitment play a big role in success. Weaknesses 1. The soft approach does not fit well into a competitive environment.Servant leaders may lag behind those other styles better suited for a competitive environment. Accountability and responsibility may get diluted. 2. Does not always work or resolve issues related to employee-organization fit. A primary function of all leaders is to match candidates with organization ob jectives. Servant leaders put the individuals goals/needs as the primary concern. 3. Building a sense of community among team members may not fit well for all members. Many wish not to share personal lives or aspirations with others at work. Personal ReflectionServant leadership may apply best in certain situations such as politics or association management. But in its purest theory, I am not convinced servant leadership is a practical leadership style 100% of the time, for any type of business. It does have many qualities that I agree with, and practice a large extent of the time. For example, I view everyone I work with as a customer. I see it as my responsibility to help them achieve success in their role. It is my duty to provide them with every resource needed in order to succeed, and it is their duty to tell me what they need.Sometimes, that includes a holistic approach, and sometimes it is as simple as acquiring a printer for them. I tread lightly when personal life problems present themselves, however. I will assist in providing direction for an employee to get the help they need, such as an EAP program, or a Pastor in our ministry development initiative. On the other hand, it is also my duty to provide corrective action, redirection, or other forms of performance feedback when employees stray from goals, objectives, vision, mission or values. As I mentioned, a part of my management style is to serve the needs of subordinates.I cant deny it isnt entirely for unselfish reasons. I use it as a motivational tactic to achieve positive outcomes. However, I am sincere in my communications in order to build trust. Good managers put the needs of others ahead of their own. However, good managers cannot put subordinate needs ahead of customers, organizational needs or stakeholder needs. Blending all styles of leadership and adapting to unique situations or people will produce positive outcomes in the long run. However, it is my opinion holding true to only one st yle of leadership may cause problems for the organization, or an individual manager.References 1. What is servant leadership?. (n. d. ). Retrieved from http//www. greenleaf. org/whatissl/ 2. Leadership development Servant Leadership. (2007, August 1). Retrieved from http//www. nova. edu/studentleadership/development/servant_leadership. html 3. Nayab, N. (2010, June 8). Servant leadership vs. authentic leadership What are the differences?. Retrieved from http//www. brighthub. com/office/home/articles/73574. aspx 4. Nayab, N. (2011, May 25). Servant leadership theory strengths and weaknesses. Retrieved from http//www. brighthub. com/office/home/articles/73511. aspx? cid=parsely_rec