Akamai Case Study Ecommerce

1. wherefore does akamai need to geographically disperse its servers to experience its costumers web content? Akamai allows its costumers to move their web- base products at hand(predicate) to their end substance absubstance ab expenditurers (local). Meaning that an Akamai website grass hawk from 4 to 10 times red-hot as non-Akamai website, collectable to the 73. 000 servers around the world. 2. If you cute to deliver softw atomic number 18 content over the profit, would you sign up for Akamais table service? Why or why not? Yes we would sign up for the Akamai service due to the following advantages * Reliability * Availability * hotfoot * Security Reporting tools with regards to problems or traffics * Scalability (the chess opening of having many another(prenominal) users and large files) 3. What advantages does an advertiser settle from utilize Akamais EdgeScape service? What kinds of products exponent benefit from this kind of service? The master(prenominal) adva ntage of this EdgeScape service is the tracking possibility of online shopping behaviour. This way an advertiser can pin point buyers based on geographic locations, and validate an end users location. 4. Why dont major business firms distribute their videos using email&160protected networks lie Bittorent?P2P actor the share-out of files between users of the P2P service such as Bittorent or Bitlord. But this also means that all users are actually servers nub that it is not easy to collect user data. Also major firms might fate to use Akamai instead of P2P as it is to a greater extent reliable, secure and stable. With the underlying infrastructure of the cyberspace major companies will nigh probable not benefit from p2p services. Due to the dull loading of websites companies will most in all probability chose for a web-streamed based content. These content are often saved on a local server and are most likely quicker distributed to their costumers. . Do you recover Internet u sers should be charged based on the amount of bandwidth they consumer, or tiered plan where users would pay in petulant proportion to their usage? No, we believe that the Internet must remain free without mass paying for the use of bandwidth. When you are charging muckle for the use of bandwidth then many people will avoid certain websites that use up agree of bandwidth such as video streaming which uses up allot of bandwidth. It might even result in people avoiding the high use of the profit due to the costs, which is bad news for many online businesses.