The History of Judicial Review

BIBLIOGRAPHY INCLUDED AT THE END OF TEXT.

In 1803 the question of whether or non un-elected judges should have the index number to overturn or square up the enforcements of any law that may conflict with the federal official record arose in the case of Marbury v. Madison. This practice is referred to as judicial critique and also applies to state laws that will possibly dispute with Federal laws or their own state constitution. The power of the courts to determine the constitutionality of a law is a necessity in the United States melody of government. A debate has continuously raged throughout the United States since the power was open up.

        Federalist John Adams lost the Presidential election of 1800 to the leader of the Anti-Federalist party, doubting Thomas Jefferson. The Judiciary Act of 1801 allowed Adams to appoint 42 justices of the peace. In pronounce to get as many Federalists in office as he could, he appointed any man he saw fit. Secretary of State John Marshall was to sign, seal, and come back these appointments on the night of March 3rd, 1801. He failed, however, to deliver them. The day after Thomas Jeffersons inauguration he ordered crowd together Madison, the new Secretary of State, to put a halt on 17 of the 42 commissions, including that of William Marbury. Mr. Marbury sued Mr.



Madison in hopes of receiving a judicial writ of mandamus, which would require Mr. Madison to give him the appointment. The courts decision in this case, create verbally by James Madison, also the one who sealed Mr. Marburys commission, established and justified judicial review. Marshalls decision on the case allowed the commanding Court to brand Thomas Jefferson as a ravisher of civil rights instead of issuing an order that he, the President, could have only when ignored.

This case brought up many questions that have...

If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com



If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper