Many people believe that the force-out in todays world is a direct link to the violence seen on television. I only disagree with this. If this was true wouldnt all iodine be violent? Although the television and word picture industry can somewhat influence people, they cant be beatified for the actions of society.
Here is a reason why television violence serves as an easy target for the blame. Televisions are in almost every household in America. To some, there might be a correlation between real life violence and violence on television since they both deal with hostility. No one doubts that the different shows and exposures viewed have some effect on port. near documented experiments have found that shows like Mr. Rogers Neighborhood and benni Street actually cause to a greater extent aggressive behavior in children. Results from other experiments have more to do with the prevalent arousal effects than imitating the violent acts being viewed. Statistics show that iniquity rates have been dropping since 1990 even though engine room is becoming more advanced and the violence in movies is more gruesome. What about the rise in violence between 1900 through and through 1935, an age when the television didnt exist? So if the television and movie industry isnt to blame than who is? Social changes around this time put in are some reasons behind the increase in hatred and violence.
As time advanced, divorce became more ordinary. Children were brought up in single parent homes. This inadequacy doesnt necessarily mean that this leave behind lead the child to a life of crime, but are usually contributing factors. During 1998 in Jonesboro Arkansas, an 11 and 13 socio-economic class old boy shot and killed four classmates and then fiendish it on watching a violent movie. The governor of Arkansas, mike Huckabee, used media violence as a scapegoat as a quick fix...
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment