Traditional drama, deal in ?Oedipus the queen regnant? by Sophocles, reflects a mankind view composed of a rational, well-ordered universe, a solid system of beliefs (faith in something, someone), a stable scale of values, an honorable system in working condition. (Johnson, 2006). Beckett, in ?Waiting for Godot?, has turned away from the traditional drama and has an entirely different worldly concern view. This world view is marked by chaos kinda of order. The universe is void ? nothing to believe in except nothingness. There is no moral ethical code. There are just people existing, being only for themselves, and sometimes by themselves. (Gordon, 2002)?Waiting for Godot?, is part of the Theatre of the Absurd. This implies that it is meant to be irrational. Absurd star sign does away with the concepts of drama, chronological plot, logical language, themes, and recognizable settings. There is in addition a split between the intellect and the body at heart the work. Thus Vladimir represents the intellect and estragon the body, both of whom cannot exist without the other. (GradeSaver, 1999)When study the structure of ?Waiting for Godot? with the structure of a traditional play, like ?Oedipus the King?, the following can be noted:?Oedipus the King? is a story with a clearly defined beginning, lay and end. It has linear progression.
There is firstly an exposition, followed by rising action, climax, fall action and lastly resolution. In the beginning, Thebes is suffering and Oedipus is trying to maintain it. In the middle, he searches diligently for the truth that will palliate it and at the end, he discovers the truth, and Thebes is saved. (GradeSaver, 1999). In ?Waiting for Godot?, the story seems meaningless or absurd. The progression is circular rather than linear. The two characters, Estragon and Vladimir, arrive to stand around waiting for Godot. They keep waiting, although...
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment