Traditionally the term conglutination has always been referred to as the union of a man and a woman. This has always been viewed and taken as both(prenominal) a serious and sacred thing. Thus at a time in human history, when common sense and system of logic seem to be lacking from human civilization, gay unification can completely be viewed in terms of rabidity and corruption. I agree that corruption may sound a bit harsh or overbearing in this case, but when you make extinct the traditional marriage, then substitute a innovational portrait of the self aforementioned(prenominal)(prenominal) charge up joining in devoted matrimony, corrupt is the first word that comes to mind. Although, primary commands against gay marriage atomic number 18 mostly based on emotion, there are some other, more concrete reasons for its ban. The most popular 1 is religion. In many different versions of the bible, and in various spectral beliefs, it is forbidden, or sinful to engage in sexual employment with someone of the same sex; let alone draw them. Some advocates against gay marriages argue that the idea of same sex marriages combat s the idea of procreation (at least in the traditional manner). All of these arguments will serve as comely grounds as to why gay marriage should be banned. Also I feel that since humans can non natural conceive and define married without intention to conceive, they do not deserve the rubric of marriage.
The idea of same sex marriage is untraditional, the idea of a traditional marriage is already decaying with at least 40% of Americans moveting divorces and having single parent household. Those who grow up in single parent households grow up thinking it o.k. to be a single parent. Which in childs play leads to a generation of individuals who consider it okay to be single parents, this same logic can...
the children they adopt will also in turn feel like it is okay to be gay, thus change magnitude the number of gay Americans This is sheer and utter ignorance - PEOPLE DO NOT CHOOSE TO BE GAY. Please could you provide statistical evidence which proves your statement that homosexual couples adopting is making it difficult for straightaway couples to adopt. I disbelieve your statement that homosexuals came up with the idea that they should get priority.
Not only is this an ignorant, sweeping generalisation, but it is just not true.
Basing your argument on the Bible is weak. Since when was the Christian perspective the only perspective, and where has it been proven that what is written in the Bible is right? A democracy should give equal rights to everyone - of all cultures, religions and sexuality. Please consider there are other opinions as well as Christianity, and that NONE of them are proven to be right. You are basing your argument on the existence of God, which I select to point out to you, is a subjective belief, not a proven one. It is short OUTRAGEOUS your ignorance of HIV. HIV is not merely a homosexual disease - it is passed between male and female as well. Your laying claim that HIV would be rife if gay marriage was legalised is essentially flawed for two reasons.
Firstly you are making the supposition that all homosexuals do not practice safe sex.
second you are making the assumption that sexual intercouse between same sex couples would actually increase because marriage was legalised. Homosexuals, like heterosexuals, have regular sex in relationships as well you know. effective because marriage isnt legal doesnt mean people arent having sex! And why are homosexuals liable to die at a jr. age!?
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment