Oedipus the King - 810 Words

â€Å"Now my curse on the murderer. Whoever he is, a lone man unknown in his crime - or one among many, let that man drag out his life in agony, step by painful step - I curse myself as well †¦ if by any chance He proves to be an intimate of our house, Here at my hearth, with my full knowledge, May the curse I just called down on him strike me!†(p. 1137). Oedipus’s intense pride or hubris, and his steadfast determination to uncover the mystery of Laius’s murder ironically leads him to unwittingly curse himself. Oedipus is considered to be a perfect tragedy. A good tragedy will elicit pity and fear in its readers or viewers, causing them to experience a sense of release. Hubris is described in Greek tragedy as excessive pride or defiance of the gods. Hubris inevitably comes up almost every time you talk about a piece of ancient Greek literature. Theres no denying that Oedipus is a proud man. He has many reasons to be proud. Hes the one that saved Thebes from the Sphinx. If he hadnt come along and solved the Sphinxs riddle, the city would still be under its dominion. It seems that Oedipus rightly deserves the throne of Thebes. Determination and hubris are just a couple of Oedipuss primary character traits. Despite the important role of fate in the life of Oedipus, he is driven by his intense pride and determination, at times stubbornly, to pursue his goals. Determination proves to be more of a weakness than a blessing for Oedipus. . In the opening of Oedipus the King,Show MoreRelatedOedipus The King Of Oedipus868 Words   |  4 Pageschallenge that waits upon one. Confidence overpowers cockiness. The cocky trait is heavily represented in the story â€Å"Oedipus the King† (c. 430 B.C.) by Sophocles. In the story, Oedipus the king of Thebes has the cocky trait and it results in torture for life. Oedipus’s arrogant personality shows throughout the story as he tries to find the killer of the former king of Thebes, his father. Oedipus tends to deem himself as a god throughout the story which plays a big role in interaction with people around himRead MoreOedipus The King : Oedipus1328 Words   |  6 PagesOedipus the King Oedipus had a lot of different character traits both good and bad. He had a good conscience; he cared deeply for the people in his life and protected them. He was very empathetic, smart and a dependable man who lived his life with great integrity. He was an honest man with strong moral principles and lived a righteous life. He found it difficult to live anything less than a righteous life; when he realized what had become of his life, his guilty conscience consumed him. He was filledRead MoreOedipus The King Of Oedipus1019 Words   |  5 Pageswhat makes Oedipus actions in his quarrel with Teiresias and also throughout the play so dramatically compelling, is the fact that the audience knows the outcome of the story. We know Oedipus fate even before he does, and there is no suspense about the outcome itself, instead, the audience anxiously awaits Oedipus to reveal his fate unto himself in his desperate quest to rid his city of the terrible plague, or maybe even more so, to simply d iscover his own unfortunate tale. Oedipus is relentlessRead MoreOedipus the King1125 Words   |  5 PagesOedipus the King by Sophocles is about Oedipus, a man doomed by his fate. Like most tragedies, #8220;Oedipus the King#8221; contains a tragic hero, a heroic figure unable to escape his/her own doom. This tragic hero usually has a hamartia or a tragic flaw which causes his/hers#8217; downfall. The tragic flaw that Sophocles gives Oedipus is hubris (exaggerated pride or self-confidence), which is what caused Oedipus to walk right into the fate he sought to escape. Pride like that of Oedipus hadRead MoreOedipus the King1065 Words   |  5 PagesSophocles’ use of irony is amongst the greatest of all time, as demonstrated masterfully in Oedipus the King. He displays both ambition and understated humour by using irony in diverse ways, both cosmic and dramatic, as well as verbal irony to add a greater level of wit. Every word spoken holds great symbolic weight and those words contribute to a narrative that reflects the gods plans. Adversely the work of Johnathan Swift takes the form of a social satire, combining economic arguments with a sociopoliticalRead MoreOedipus the King1164 Words   |  5 Pagesmen of high reputation and good fortune such as Oedipus.† This attitude, commonly found in men of high station is not specifically identified as pride in the case of Oedipus and, indeed, different readings can place Oedipus’ great flaw in a number of areas. It seems as if Sophocles intended to emphasize the more common interpr etation of Oedipus’ flaw being excessive pride, but other interpretations, such as Pier Paolo Pasolini’s 1967 film Oedipus Rex, present other possibilities as the main characterRead MoreOedipus the King773 Words   |  4 PagesThe Greek drama Oedipus the King, written by Sophocles, is regarded as one of the most perfect tragedies ever written. The tragedy Oedipus the King is highly esteemed partly due to its use of dramatic irony. Dramatic irony means that facts or events, which are not known to the characters on stage or in a fictional work, are known to the audience or reader. Sophocles uses dramatic irony to demonstrate how little the protagonist really knows. The main dramatic irony in Oedipus the King contrasts Oedipus’sRead MoreOedipus The King, Or Oedipus Rex1249 Words   |  5 Pagesmost famous probably being Sophocles’ Oedipus the King, or Oedipus Rex. For a play to be considered a tragedy, it must have a tragic hero. According to Aristotleâ €™s definition of a tragic hero, they must be a decent moral person, of high social standing who eventually meets with a tragic downfall, of their own doing, suffering more than deserved, and realizing their error too late. In the play Oedipus the King, Oedipus is the epitome of a tragic hero. Oedipus Rex was generally a â€Å"good† person; heRead MoreOedipus The King And Oedipus At Colonus1567 Words   |  7 Pagesworks of Sophocles and particularly evident in Oedipus the King and Oedipus at Colonus, not only exalts the Greek nationalism present at the date of composition but dictates the course of the story, evolving as its tragic hero works through his fated anguish. Hubris, defined as exaggerated pride or self-confidence, is the earmark character trait of Oedipus and perhaps Creon. However, it is the abandonment of his sanctimonious nature that distinguishes Oedipus as a true hero. The theme of the evolutionRead MoreOedipus The King, And Oedipus At Colonus1343 Words   |  6 Pages Oedipus, a play written by Sophocles, has become a staple in the study of a Tragic hero in classic literature. When this was written in the fifth century, theatre was more than a means of entertainment but almost a religious event. Robert Fagles goes even further by saying tha t†theatre was not only a religious festival; it was also an aspect of the city’s political life.† (Fagles) . Greek dramas were presented only twice a year during religious festivals that honored Dionysus, the god of wines

Hamlet, By William Shakespeare - 1492 Words

One must always be able to see the flaws in their idols. The play Hamlet centers on protagonist Hamlet as he questions whether to take revenge against his uncle for killing his father or leave him alive. Written by William Shakespeare in the early 17th century, Hamlet addresses motifs of indecisiveness, insanity, as well as death and suicide. Furthermore, the majority of these motifs are left up to interpretation. Throughout the play, the family, friends, and acquaintances of Hamlet insist that he has lost his mind drowning in his melancholy over his father’s death. Some may argue that he remains in this state of mind throughout the play. However, it is clear that Hamlet develops more clarity of thought by his final soliloquy. Through the contrast between Hamlet’s thoughts and actions in Act II and IV, Shakespeare effectively establishes Hamlet’s sanity by the end of the play. Furthermore, through this Shakespeare also establishes the catalyst behind Hamletâ€⠄¢s decisions in his third and sixth soliloquies to be his idolization of others. The fact that Hamlet looks at situations with a narrowed perspective contributes to his lack of clarity of thought at the beginning of the play. Furthermore, the fact that Hamlet is able to look as situations with a more broad perspective by Act 4 establishes his character development. In his third soliloquy, Hamlet states in lines 563-565, â€Å"What would he do/ Had he the motive and the cue for passion/ That I have? He would drown the stageShow MoreRelatedHamlet, By William Shakespeare880 Words   |  4 PagesWilliam Shakespeare is praised as the pioneering English poet and playwright whose collection of theatrical works is regarded as the greatest artistic value throughout the history of English literature. Shakespeare delved into the spiritual and mental component of humanity and the consequences that arise from this human spirit when it is disputed. The most famous revenge tragedy play, Hamlet, is an excellent illustration of Shakespeare’s philosophical study of human nature. In Hamlet, the arguableRead MoreHamlet, By William Shakespeare899 Words   |  4 PagesWilliam Shakespeare, author of Hamlet, was a well-known author in the 1500s and is still popular today. He was born on April 24, 1564 in London, England. Although there were no birth records at that time, it shows he was baptized one year prior to that, which leads us to believe his birthday was in 1564 because children were normally baptized a year after their birth. Shakespeare’s writing style was very different than others at that time. He used many metaphors and rhetorical phrases, and most ofRead MoreHamlet, By William Shakespeare996 Words   |  4 PagesHamlet, written by William Shakespeare, with out a doubt holds the most famous soliloquy in English history spoken by Hamlet in Act III, scene i, lines 57-90. This soliloquy holds much importance to the play as a whole because it ties together the reoccurring themes of suicide and Hamlet’s inaction portrayed by Shakespeare. Hamlet poses a problem, which is the driving force of the play: â€Å"To be or not to be?†(III.i.57). Shakespeare uses this logical question asked by Hamlet to drive out his underlyingRead MoreHamlet, By William Shakespeare1178 Words   |  5 Pages In William Shakespeare’s play Hamlet, the protagonist suffers from struggles with major characters, especially with the women in his life. While reading the play Hamlet, Hamlet appears to be a disillusioned man. Throughout the play, Shakespeare has only casted two females: Gertrude and Ophelia. Gertrude is defined to be incestuous, naà ¯ve and cold-hearted. On the other side, Ophelia is characterized to be ignorant, innocent and fearful. After the quick marriage of his mother and evil uncle, Hamlet’sRead MoreHamlet, By William Shakespeare1308 Words   |  6 PagesHamlet is arguably one of the greatest tragedies in all of literature and when most people think of tragic plays, they think of none other than the one who wrote it, William Shakespeare. This classic story of revenge excites it’s readers with its main character, Prince Hamlet, who goes through the unique human-like process of revenge that is often overlooked. Many other stories rely heavily on the logi c of good people doing good things and bad people doing bad things just for the sake of their natureRead MoreHamlet, By William Shakespeare Essay1453 Words   |  6 PagesHamlet by William Shakespeare explores many aspects of mankind--death, betrayal, love, and mourning. Out of these, the most prominent theme in this play is death in the form of suicide. The main character, Hamlet, finds himself questioning the quality of life and the uncertainty of the afterlife once he discovers news of his father s death and the corruption in the kingdom that follows. Ophelia, Hamlet’s lover, is found dead later in the plot and is presumed to have committed suicide. In Hamlet’sRead MoreHamlet, By William Shakespeare1146 Words   |  5 PagesA character so complex, enticing and fascinating, his name is Hamlet. We are all Hamlet, and that, is the argument. Hamlet is an enigmatic character with many flaws. These flaws are the ones that prove similarities between us and him. A play so popular and significant is due to its huge relevance to us as a society. In the play Hamlet, William Shakespeare uses Hamlet’s character and metaphor to demonstrate that when one is left alone to their thoughts, these thoughts overtake reason. ConsequentlyRead MoreHamlet by William Shakespeare1456 Words   |  6 PagesThe play Hamlet, by William Shakespeare, takes place in a time where the impossible was a part of the lives of everyday people. Occurrences that people in the modern time would believe unbelievable. Yet, with just a quill and parchment Shakespeare’s is able to connect the past and present by weaving a plot with skill that is still unparalleled to this day. The play Hamlet this exceeds this expectation by revealing depth of Hamlets, the protagonists, character personality through the useRead MoreHamlet, By William Shakespeare1920 Words   |  8 PagesIn the play Hamlet by William Shakespeare, the character Hamlet must deal with both external and internal conflict. Hamlet encounters many struggles and has trouble finding a way to deal with them. With so many corrupt people in his life, Hamlet feels as if there is no one that he can trust and begins to isolate himself from others. A result from this isolation leads Hamlet to become melancholy. Hamlet struggles with suicidal thoughts, wants to kill King Claudius, and is distraught over his mother’sRead MoreHamlet, By William Shakespeare900 Words   |  4 PagesIn this story Hamlet, by William Shakespeare, there was an excessive deal of questions surrounding Hamlet’s mental state. Claudius’s nephew hadn’t been the same since his father passed away. It’s been up for discussion as if he’s actually senseless surrounding the death, or the wedding between his mom and uncle. Gertrude and the King married approximately a month or two after the funeral. At this point it’s not actually established what the cause of his actions is. Was Hamlet at fault for Polonius’s

Sociology and Teaching Egalitarian Society

Question: Describe about the Sociology and Teaching for Egalitarian Society. Answer: Is Australia an egalitarian society? - Your answer should focus on economic inequality and class, or gender. An egalitarian society refers to a society that values equality among its people. Therefore, it treats all her people equally and provides equal opportunities in political, economic, and social rights. Further, an egalitarian society seeks to eliminate various forms of inequality which leads to discrimination founded on ethnicity, gender, religion, sexual orientation or race (Henslin Elder, 2015). This understanding leads to the question is Australia an egalitarian society? Australia as a society has undergone evolution since the colonial era. In the course of her development, it abandoned the class barriers of colonialist and spread the political and the economic opportunities more than the colonial masters. However, Australia's egalitarian, democratic trends were hampered by greedy capitalists. Thus, the egalitarian, democratic reformers would not implement the social and political policies that could have annihilated elements such as; political, economic, and social inequality (T hompson, 1994). The development of efficient transport and communication networks has facilitated to globalization. Globalization, therefore, has significantly contributed to the probe of Australia as an egalitarian society. The probe is founded on the increase of income disparities among the Australians. Hence, the question what is causing the economic disparity and what government should do to curb it. Lawrence (2015) argues that the rise in economic inequality is a normal impact of globalization, hence, unavoidable. Glover (2015) on the other hand, argues that the economic inequality is a result of national factors that could be avoided. Ken Henry, a former Treasury secretary, argues that economic globalization may impact on the national economy but the magnitude of the impact is determined by the development policies propelling the national economy. Thus, as a result of unjust policies Australian society has grown unequal more than at any stage in her history as a country. The levels of disparit y are such that 1% of the adult population possess 60% of the country's wealth, while the rest have only the consumer durables and no net wealth at all. Walmsley (1997) attribute the economic disparity to three factors which include taxation, new technology, and globalization, and finally the diminishing of union movements. The government has implemented tax policies that reduce tax rates progression hence emphasizing on the indirect taxes. Similarly, the decline of the labour movement has denied the citizenry the ability of collective bargaining to individual negotiation. This reduction has allowed exploitation of workers and less growth of their incomes. Additionally, new technology and globalization have offered a few opportunities to access the global market. Professionals such as sportspeople, entertainers, and other high profile professionals have ventured into the world market. The world market thus has increased significantly the income of only a handful of individuals. Attempts to invite expatriates to head the Australian firms have forced the government to increase the salaries and benefits of all the chief executive's offi cers hence creating excessively wealthy individuals (Holmes Julian, 2014). Such economic inequalities reflect what Karl Marx perceived as social inequalities resulting from class-ridden capitalist societies, where bourgeoisies exercise political and economic power over the workers, hence, control all means of production. This argument by Marx is mirrored by the Australian society today in which, class interests are intrinsically tied to the Australian development policies furthering the disparity. To ensure the issue of economic disparity remains hidden, misrepresented, and misunderstood the government authorities deliberately fails to include the data of income inequality in the government financial reports. It is explicit that Marx concepts present economic key which illustrates the foundations of the unequal trade which leads to the economic inequality. Cementing profit on the basis of private property perpetuates the economic inequality. To remedy this form of inequality Marx Weber suggests a harmonization of capital and labour, which results to non-eco nomic disparity (Glover, 2015). In the last quarter of a century, Australian society has made tremendous progress to reduce discrimination against minority groups and especially women. However, gender disparity is still prevailing; women in some companies earn less than their male counterparts in the same positions. Similarly, men are denied equal access to parental leaves and other family policies enjoyed by women. Though such gender inequality exists a lot have been achieved through allowing both genders equal access to education, job opportunities, rewards, and resources. Besides, all the Australian government policies and decision-making process reflects the needs of women and the minority groups. As a result, the Australian government has implemented policies that enhance greater choices and opportunities for women. To illustrate its commitment to the issues of gender equality Australian government is a signatory to the CEDAW-Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (Stilwell Jordan, 2007). In conclusion, with such issues affecting the Australian society, it cannot be categorized as an ideal egalitarian society. Although the growth of industries has contributed to better living of the workers, it has created opportunities for bourgeoisies to amass unjust wealth. It should be clear to all Australians that in the midst of pseudo sustainable economic growth, the crisis of inequality and poverty are exacerbating. Moreover, they should be cognisant of the fact that a democracy that is founded on the egalitarian principles should be reflected in all facets of life. Political and economic inequalities are therefore inconsistent with the egalitarian principles hence the need to eliminate such disparities. What is state power and how might it be important in the sociological study of one or more of the following: ethnicity, aboriginality? In political sociology, state power can be traced to three developmental stages of a state which include: multiplicity of state functions, the necessity of the state, and territorialized centrality of the state. The necessity of the state implies that every civilized people are organized under a single authority which is limited in scope. The multiplicity of state functions refers to the domestic and the international roles the government plays. Territorialized centrality of the state entails the territorial bounders and the institutions under which the state power is exercised (Coakley, 2012). Thus, the autonomous state power is characterized by two understandings. One understanding connotes despotic powers, that is, the power which is exercised without any control, routine or institution and without any negotiations with civil groups. The second understanding implies infrastructural powers, that is, a power which is implemented within systems and through political participation. Th erefore, where state power is exercised fairly, the societies are organized, centralized, and territorialized. In Marx Weber analysis of the state power he distinguishes between power and authority. Weber view power as the coercion of individuals by use of threats while authority is the legal use of power in which individuals act upon orders because they are just and right. Marx further points out that if state powers are utilized for political gains, it disintegrates a cohesive society into ethnic cocoons. In the modern societies, ethnicity constitutes a basis of identity. Hence, ethnicity is a term that is used to communicate an idea of shared traditions, culture, and a way of life (Irfan, 2014). Moreover, sharing is be mirrored in material culture, for example, food, and clothing, cultural products for instance arts and music, religion or language. Ethnicity, therefore, plays a significant role in enhancing social conflict or social cohesion. The state power thus can be utilized to build social cohesion or social conflict through creating ethnic equality or inequalities. The importance of the state power on the issue of ethnicity can be viewed through sociological perspectives such as conflict theory, functionalism, and social interaction theory (Enloe, 1980). In the view of the conflict theory, the state should use its powers to foster economic, social, and political inequality to the ethnic group that critiques the structure and the policies of the government. According to the theory, the state power is, therefore, a tool to control resources, institutions, and politics which constitute a society. However, conflict theory offers a sound basis for demanding social change. The subjugated ethnic group should demand even distribution of power, political, and economic rights. Ludwig perceives civilization as a result of conflict between ethnic groups. The social forces are organized regarding the ethnic struggle to safeguard the interests and the ideologies of the group. To succeed various means are employed including capturing some of the state apparatus. Further, the oppressed ethnic group may utilize their economic and social power to upset the government policies. In the midst of the social conflicts, it is the role of the state power to maintain social order and preserve the existing hierarchies of power (Hattam, 2014). In the perspective of the functionalism, state power should promote ethnic inequalities because it serves a critical function for the society existence. This idea is, however, contentious and problematic. Does lead to questions such as, how discrimination can render positive results in society? Sociologists who are subscribed to this school of thought, however, argue that ethnic discrimination and inequality contribute positively to the dominant groups. Also, they perceive discrimination against a given ethnic group as a source of close ties which promote social cohesion within the group. This cohesion can have immense political and economic benefits in search for recognition. Further, the close ties offer the cultural and emotional support needed by those individuals who feel mistreated by the dominant group (Osaghae, 1996). In the symbolic interaction theory, the state power utilizes strong symbols from a given ethnic group hence creating a given identity which leads to discrimination and inequality. Ahmar (1996) argues that the use of such symbols the dominant ethnic group creates an abstract picture of the subordinate ethnic groups hence sustaining the status quo. When the state power chooses a particular symbol from a certain ethnic group, it enhances a culture of prejudice. Such images influence the thought process of the citizenry thus fuelling social conflict (Migdal Shue, 1994). In conclusion, state power contributes to understanding how society is organized. Maintenance of social cohesion is dependent on how the state power is exercised. To enhance stable social cohesion, the state power must be applied justly and equitably, thus, providing social, political, and economic opportunities to all the ethnic groups. Promotion of inequality results to the social conflict which may lead to genocide or war. State power, therefore, should be implemented in a manner that justifies state dominance. Additionally, the government should utilize its powers to create mutual appreciation among various ethnic groups. The mutual recognition should be tested through the incorporation of symbols from different ethnic communities and is accepted by all the ethnic groups constituting the state. The channels through which state power is exercised should be structured to ensure the legitimate exercise of power. References Ahmar, M. (1996). Ethnicity and State Power in Pakistan: The Karachi Crisis. Asian Survey, 36(10), 1031-1048. Coakley, J. (2012). Nationalism, ethnicity and the state: making and breaking nations. Sage. Enloe, C. H. (1980). Police, military, and ethnicity: Foundations of state power. Transaction Books. Glover, D. (2015). An economy is not a society: Winners and losers in the new Australia (Vol. 7). Black Inc. Hattam, V. C. (2014). Labor visions and state power: The origins of business unionism in the United States. Princeton University Press. Henslin, J. M., Possamai, A. M., Possamai-Inesedy, A. L., Marjoribanks, T., Elder, K. (2015). Sociology: A down to earth approach. Pearson Higher Education AU. Holmes, D., Hughes, K., Julian, R. (2014). Australian sociology. Pearson Australia. Irfan, M. D. (2014). Nationalism, Ethnicity and the State: Making and Breaking Nations by John Coakley. London: Sage. Lawrence, C. (2015). Inequality, civil Society and social solidarity. Australian Options, (82), 25. Migdal, J. S., Kohli, A., Shue, V. (1994). State power and social forces: domination and transformation in the Third World. Cambridge University Press. Osaghae, E. E. (1996). Ethnicity, class and the struggle for state power in Liberia (Vol. 1). Codesria. Stilwell, F., Jordan, K. (2007). Who gets what?: analysing economic inequality in Australia. Cambridge University Press. Thompson, E. (1994). Fair enough: egalitarianism in Australia. Thomas Telford. Walmsley, D. J., Weinand, H. C. (1997). Is Australia becoming more unequal?. The Australian Geographer, 28(1), 69-88.

Nuclear Family Debate Essay Example For Students

Nuclear Family Debate Essay A  family  is a  group  of  people  who  live  together. They share the housework and take care of one another. There are three types of family:  nuclear family,  single-parent family  and  extended family. A  Nuclear Family  is made up of father, mother and one or more children living together. A Joint Family made up of father, mother, grandparents, uncles, aunts, cousins, nieces, and nephews. The nuclear family is not a recent phenomenon, but has existed in many cultures throughout human history. Indeed, the extended family of several generations is found mostly in relatively advanced, stable, and affluent, but not yet industrialized societies. Very primitive and very sophisticated societies seem to prefer the nuclear family model. However, nuclear families can vary in the degree of their isolation and restrictedness. For example, before the Industrial Revolution the Western nuclear family was often embedded in a larger social unit, such as a farm or estate, an aristocratic court, or a village populated by relatives. Many older city neighbourhoods also kept kinship ties strong, and thus even very small families remained open to the community. Family visits might be frequent and extended; children might freely circulate and feel at home in several households. The traditional nuclear family basically is made up of a father, mother and a couple of children or so, and hence is compact and small. The father’s role is of providing for the family as well as protecting it, while also being the family’s disciplinary role model. The woman’s role within the traditional nuclear family consists of housework and motherhood. In recent decades, this traditional form of the family has undergone major changes, with increasing rates of divorce leading to single-parent families, remarriages, resulting in extended families. These trends and the resulting problems that they cause, especially for the children, has brought the advantages of traditional nuclear families back into focus. So, Here are Some of the Main Advantages of the Nuclear Family: A Stable Environment:  Children raised in a family with the same parents during their growing years have a higher likelihood of having stability in their relationship and emotional bonding. Children that grow up in a single-parent household have higher chances of feeling a sense of loss regarding the absent parent, and miss out on the advantage of the emotional support and dual insights that both a father and a mother can provide. Behavioural Stability:  With both the father and the mother, children get a better sense of what is acceptable and unacceptable, as far as behaviour is concerned, especially when both the parents look after their nurturing. When both parents agree on the kind of behaviour that they want from their children, it adds authority, and thus can be instilled in a better way. Sharing Responsibility:  With two parents sharing the responsibility of raising the children, it enables one parent to take time to pursue other interests or get a rest while the other parent plays or works with the children. Children that are raised in a traditional nuclear family also tend to take on some of the sharing of the responsibilities, such as older siblings taking care of younger siblings. In a nuclear family, such roles are usually performed by expectation and example, rather than formal instruction. Skill building: When a child is a member of a nuclear family, the child will often receive more extensive life skills training as a result. For example, a mother is more likely to teach relationship skills, such as how to get along with others and emotional response skills while a father is more likely to challenge a child to develop sports or handiwork skills, such as how to hit a baseball or how to fix things, and how to relate to the outside world such as employment skills or driving skills. Physical and Emotional Support:  Nuclear families usually have more physical and emotional resources with which they can reinforce the whole. Through observing their parents and by following the examples set by them, children learn how to help in the building of the family.