The Master and The Prince

Lao Tzu was a scholar in the Zhou Dynasty. In the sixth century BC, he wrote the Tao-te Ching as he was inspired by a world interweave in the Tao. Machiavelli had a sure-fire career as a statesman in Florence. In 1513, he was accused of plotting against the Medici family; he was imprisoned, tortured and then send out into exile unless outside the city. It seems he had write The Prince in order to register his ability as consultant to new princes as a ploy to enter the policy-making scene. Lao Tzu and Machiavelli, existence both philosophical legends in their sustain eras share with the world their make assimilates of how a hoidenish is to be run. One found in the Tao and the other in governmental cruelty sharply furrow one another in the ultimate purpose and tend of the state, the obligations of the leader to the hatful organism led, and the citeistics of the leader. \nLao Tzus and Machiavellis relationship of the leader to the people is rooted in purloin foundatio n beliefs of the inner character of humans. Machiavelli has a low see to it of human nature establish on his own mirror image that people behave in predictably bad shipway; they are fickle, lie, and are greedy. Lao Tzu has a high view of human nature based on his belief in the Tao that reveals the good and trustworthiness of all told people. The leader of Lao Tzus Tao-te Ching is referred to as the passkey. The surmount is to allot his people by existence an example. In leading their country they actually are to honor their people. The relationship between the Master and the people should show simplicity, patience, and compassion. The Master must avoid try to educate the people, instead cover it simple and clear being content with regular lifetime which in return entrust lead people to their admittedly nature of Tao. Lao Tzu has intentional a sort of anarchy to take over, thus exposing everyone to be guided by his or her inner nature of good. \nThe dowry for Machiav ellis prince requires him to use revere to achieve ef...