The results from the implementation of uniforms form convinced many school boards to clear similar philosophies. However, these results seem superficial and fantastical while control ones freedoms. How can a shirt or tie maximise learning and level economic differences? How can it be the resolving power to the problems, which schools are facing?
Uniforms were first implemented to level or conceal economic differences of individuals in a school. Well, do they? Schools play to sign contracts with trusted clothing companies to manufacture these uniforms. These companies monopolize this market, heave the prices of uniforms to their desire. An average uniform in Toronto costs approximately $200. For financially challenged families, the price can be quite burdensome. With their limited funds, they have to sacrifice other important expenses for their children to afford one or two sets of uniforms. Children from these families have to wash their uniforms more often, thus reduce the quality of it. Therefore, the economic differences in schools can be exclusively seen through the cleanliness or the condition of a shirt.
The economic difference in schools is only a small part of the controversy to uniforms. some people, especially students, feel that uniforms are a violation of their rights and freedoms. end-to-end history, clothing has been a key symbol of cultural and ghostly identity. It has evolved, in todays context, as a form of art and self- mental synthesis. Uniforms repress that need. It imposes conformity upon students. If uniforms seem so promising, then it is truly a menace to expression. It forces students to wear undesirable clothing, destructs confidence in certain students, and denies the right for students to have a personal identity and expression (through their clothing). Regular clothing does not infringe these rights (if it is not foul or cause harm to others). If implemented, uniforms are an...
Youve apparently make a good job in thinking about(predicate) this issue and your strong feelings on the subject are obvious. The media is in general privately owned in most free societies and cannot be compelled to instill a certain set of values in youngsters. Because much of the media is a for-profit enterprise, programming will be chosen for reasons other than properly raising children. Parents bear primary responsibleness for conveying a set of values to their children but mustiness compete with influences such as peer groups, advertisers, and Hollywood. Uniforms may not be workable in many public schools and in that respect does not seem to be an easy solution to the pestilential problem of lagging student performance.
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment