After learning of Chris McCandless?s experience in Alaska, many brush aside his odyssey as the ?same story: idealistic, energetic young guys who overestimated themselves, underestimated the country, and finish up in trouble? (71). To them, ?McCandless was hardly unique? (71). understandably conveyed in Into the Wild by Jon Krakauer, he was a headstrong rebellious individual who did not like being overly close to people, and influenced by writers? such as Jack capital of the United Kingdom?s works on nature, decided to embark on the journey to Alaska.
An individual brimming with raw talent, McCandless is ?supremely confirming? (118), arrogant, stubborn and impatient. He refuses to slow down for anything or anyone, and disregards monumental details, nodding politely when being persuaded or urged, further to ?do exactly what he wanted? (119) afterwards. This is why he entered Alaska without amply considering his family, friends and all the risks. He took it as a challenge and face it head-on. It is also because he is so smart and talented that he had such high expectations for himself, and plenty of pride. This is shown when he started running. Everytime ?he did worsened than he expected? (112), he was really hard on himself. He would ?internalize the disappointment? (112) and ?go off but somewhere and beat himself up? (112).
He expects too overmuch of himself, biting off more than he can chew, only to disappoint himself later on. He is very independent and despises authorisation of any kind, including his parents. Therefore he never shares anything with his parents, bottling everything up, which does not dissolve his problems as the root of them is his father?s affair with his ex-wife. An causa is when he gets an F in high school natural philosophy because he did not write his lab reports in the formatting his teacher asked him to.
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment